Matthew Arnold, Stephen Fink, et al.
DYNAMO 2000
Virtual machines face significant performance challenges beyond those confronted by traditional static optimizers. First, portable program representations and dynamic language features, such as dynamic class loading, force the deferral of most optimizations until runtime, inducing runtime optimization overhead. Second, modular program representations preclude many forms of whole-program interprocedural optimization. Third, virtual machines incur additional costs for runtime services such as security guarantees and automatic memory management. To address these challenges, vendors have invested considerable resources into adaptive optimization systems in production virtual machines. Today, mainstream virtual machine implementations include substantial infrastructure for online monitoring and profiling, runtime compilation, and feedback-directed optimization. As a result, adaptive optimization has begun to mature as a widespread production-level technology. This paper surveys the evolution and current state of adaptive optimization technology in virtual machines. © 2005 IEEE.
Matthew Arnold, Stephen Fink, et al.
DYNAMO 2000
Peter F. Sweeney, Matthias Hauswirth, et al.
VM 2004
Matthew Arnold, Stephen Fink, et al.
SIGPLAN Notices (ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages)
Ajeet Shankar, Matthew Arnold, et al.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices