Manuel Blum, Ashok K. Chandra, et al.
Information Processing Letters
I've just served on my second POPL program committee, and thought that some people may be interested in my observations. A POPL extended abstract should be designed to be read by the program committee and should not be the final paper. As with all writing, it should be written with its audience in mind. An author who has not served on the committee may not have a clear conception of the refereeing process and what effect that has on the acceptance of papers.
Manuel Blum, Ashok K. Chandra, et al.
Information Processing Letters
M.S. Paterson, Mark N. Wegman
STOC 1976
Marc Auslander, William Harrison, et al.
GLOBECOM 1985
Larry Carter, Larry Stockmeyer, et al.
STOC 1985